Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
NEWS RELEASE · 8th April 2011
ForestEthics
Enbridge has submitted a new spill response plan for its proposed Northern Gateway pipeline project, but B.C. groups say a recently released video of Enbridge’s Michigan oil spill clean up shows that the company cannot be trusted.

In the video (http://vimeo.com/22067803), a former member of Enbridge’s oil spill cleanup crew shows areas where workers were ordered to hide spilled oil by covering it with leaves and grass.

View the Michigan video at: http://vimeo.com/22067803

“Is this what we could expect if Enbridge spilled oil across the Skeena? Dead salmon, spoiled land and instructions to just hide the oil when their insurance money runs out?” said Shannon McPhail, executive director of the Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition.

Enbridge recently submitted an oil spill cleanup plan to the federal Joint Review Panel assessing the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline. The plan includes “natural recovery” (leaving oil in the environment) as well as the use of booms and chemical dispersants similar to the ones used in the BP oil spill. There is no reference to how long it would take to respond to spills in remote areas. The company has promised a more detailed plan, but only six months before pipeline construction begins.

“This latest document reinforces the fact that Enbridge is not prepared to deal with oil spills in our region,” said Nikki Skuce with ForestEthics. “The approaches listed are either ineffective in certain weather conditions, or come with their own serious environmental risks.”

“Furthermore, Enbridge’s irresponsible behavior in Michigan shows it can’t be trusted to protect the interests of residents and act in good faith,” Skuce added. “This is not the kind of company we want in Northwest B.C.”

Michigan resident John Bolenbaugh was hired as an oil spill clean-up worker for $2,300/week in his hometown of Battle Creek, Michigan where Enbridge spilled over 3 million litres of oil last summer. Enbridge fired him after he refused to cover up the oil, and has actively obstructed his efforts to uncover the truth about Enbridge’s oil cleanup.
Your Back Yard
Comment by Richard Morhart on 11th April 2011
You still want this Northern Gate-Way pipeline. I think the facts speak for themselfs. Only those who have anything to gain,$$$$$$$. Greed will rule. It`s a Shame. Always has alway will
Monitoring the Company?
Comment by Barry English on 11th April 2011
Gary, you are right that these companies need to be monitored, but we know that allowing major industries to police themselves is a poor idea (eg. oil and gas, forests). There never seems to be a problem as far as they are concerned.

I like the idea of the companies funding the monitoring group, but that group has to be completely independant if it is to have any impact at all. Government mandated and controlled might work, IF we have an at least reasonably competent and consciencious department to oversee the monitoring group.
Cleanup bond
Comment by Gary Edwards on 10th April 2011
Any company that endeavors to put the environment at risk with their business ventures must be made to post bonds in the billions to cover costs of the cleanup. There should also be a department set up to monitor the cleanup on site paid for by these companies.
Uh huh...
Comment by Pat on 9th April 2011
"the company cannot be trusted."

pretty much says it all.