Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
REPORTING · 17th June 2011
Canadian Human RightsCommision
Canadian Human Rights Commission Applauds Extension of Rights Laws to First Nations

The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) celebrates the Royal Assent of Bill C-21 which extends human rights protection to First Nations peoples living under the Indian Act.

"After more than 30 years, First Nations peoples in Canada finally have access to the same level of fundamental human rights protection that most Canadians take for granted. The passage of this bill is a milestone in the development of human rights law in Canada," said CHRC Chief Commissioner Jennifer Lynch, Q.C.

Ms. Lynch was responding to Bill C-21's receiving Royal Assent, repealing section 67 of the Canadian Human Rights Act which denied full access to human rights law under the Act to First Nations peoples.

Effective immediately, the Commission can accept complaints against the federal government dealing with the Indian Act that were previously exempted because of section 67. The bill provides for a three-year transition period before complaints can be received against First Nations governing authorities.

The Commission has entered into discussions with key national Aboriginal organizations to plan for implementation. "The Commission looks forward to working closely with Aboriginal organizations to build a human rights system that reflects and respects Aboriginal peoples' cultures and traditional laws," Ms. Lynch said.

The Commission emphasized the importance of the requirement that a joint study be undertaken by the Government of Canada with representatives of First Nations in order to identify what is needed to ensure effective implementation, including fiscal and human resources. The amended bill also includes a non-derogation clause and an interpretive clause.

Royal Assent of Bill C-21 marks the first substantive amendment to the Canadian Human Rights Act since it was changed to recognize the duty to accommodate in 1998.

sueing haisla hereditory chiefs
Comment by garry wilson on 19th July 2011
It's been more than 2 years since the Haisla band councelors and the Haisla hereditory chiefs and still no descission. What happened to a fair and speedy trial, this should be dealt with years ago! I think the judge has no jurisdiction over our land and title. Thank god theres basic human rights on reserve now!!
Comment by jr on 25th June 2011
Maybe the editors should look at a thesaurus for other descriptions, such as First Nation's, aboriginal, maybe even "Natives" Indian refers to Columbus's mistake thinking he had landed in India!
Comment by J on 24th June 2011
wow, I hadn't the slightest clue that even after the government changed the INAC name to aboriginal affairs and northern development, that the word INDIAN would still be used! and we INDIANS have always had rights! the white folk just chose to ignore it!