Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
NEWS RELEASE · 9th September 2011
MP Nathan Cullen
Official Opposition New Democrats today accused the Conservative government of sabotaging a comprehensive ocean management plan to protect the environment and economic needs of the Pacific North Coast.

The political decision, based on pressure from large oil and gas corporations, will put the marine planning process – and the Pacific coast – at risk.

The Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area (PNCIMA) planning process has been a joint effort by the federal, provincial and First Nations governments to obtain input from residents and stakeholders on a plan to protect the cultural, economic, and ecological health of the Pacific North Coast.

New Democrat MP Nathan Cullen (Skeena-Bulkley Valley) said the federal government’s sudden and unilateral withdrawal from the funding agreement smacks of political interference.

“Everybody has been in favor of this process. The provincial government wants it, First Nations want it – even the Department of Fisheries and Oceans wanted to continue. But the Prime Minister has put big oil company interests ahead of good policy and scuttled the plan.”

“It's outrageous that the federal government is withdrawing from PNCIMA,” said New Democrat Fisheries and Oceans critic Fin Donnelly. "This management process will help determine where economic activity should and should not occur along BC's sensitive coast. It will also help protect ecologically sensitive areas of the ocean and our fisheries. Canada has made an international commitment to establish marine protected areas by 2012, and its highly political decision to withdraw from PNCIMA puts this at risk.”

“They’re clearly throwing a bone to their oil patch buddies and to Enbridge – trying to help them build a pipeline that nobody wants through one of the most beautiful and ecologically diverse places in Canada,” said Cullen. “The government should immediately reverse its decision and come back to the table.”
no he doesn't speak for every one
Comment by Apocalypse Now on 10th September 2011
He has never said he spoke for every one but I am willing to bet he speaks for the majority of the people in his riding, which is what he is supposed to do. kitimat will do just fine without an oil port.
Kitimat Potential
Comment by Larry Thompson on 10th September 2011
Nathan does not speak for "EVERYONE". How about the thousands of people that have had to relocate to work for the booming oilsands. The stuff we are seeing in Kitimat right now is exciting and I feel that we will have a very good future here in this town. I think that the pipeline will be built to the highest standards and emergency plans put in place to deal with possible spills. We need to get off the Americans market and start seeking alternative markets. I don't like exporting raw products like this but it may open the door to other spin off industries.