NEWS RELEASE · 2nd May 2012
TML slammed for offensive attack on Aboriginal participation in Prosperity Mine review
A deeply offensive letter from Taseko Mines Ltd (TML) to the Harper government, urging Environment Minister Kent to impose new limits on First Nations participation and remove key Aboriginal concerns from the review of its rebid Prosperity Mine proposal, raises fears that the company’s lobbying could reduce the federal review to a version of British Columbia’s weak “rubberstamp” process that approved TML’s first, discredited bid.
In a recently obtained Nov. 23, 2011 letter to Minister Kent, TML President and CEO Russell Hallbauer urges Minister Kent to:
• Prohibit Aboriginal prayers or ceremonies at the start of Panel hearings – even though this is a matter of basic respect by governments and tribunals when engaging with First Nations;
• Impose new limits on our communities’ ability to expressing their views, including those of our youth, whose future is at stake, and by banning videos and other commentaries; and
• Prevent the Panel from considering the spiritual importance of the area to the Tsilhqot’in people, even though this is central to our culture.
The profound spiritual importance of this area to the Tsilhqot’in people was a significant factor in the decision of the federal panel that reviewed the original Prosperity Mine proposal. That proposal was soundly rejected by the Federal Government in November 2010, in part based on permanent, high magnitude impacts on Tsilhqot’in culture and cultural heritage.
“This is a black eye to the mining industry and we hope it is not one it would endorse, but we are not surprised that Mr. Hallbauer would write such an offensive letter,” said Chief Alphonse.
“We have warned over and over again that this company does not understand or respect First Nations or our issues. This letter proves, once again, that this is the wrong project, in the wrong place, by the wrong company.”
Mr. Hallbauer’s letter underscores concerns raised earlier by TML’s campaign to prevent the new Panel from deciding the significance of impacts on Aboriginal rights. The previous Panel concluded that the original Project would have significant impacts on Tsilhqot’in Aboriginal rights.
First Nations are alarmed that the draft Terms of Reference for the new Panel, which are expected to be finalized any day, would drastically reduce or even remove the new Panel’s mandate to consider impacts on Aboriginal rights.
Chief Alphonse added: “What concerns us is this letter is part of a major lobbying campaign by TML, which had three lobbyists registered in Ottawa on this file. The failure of CEAA or the government to assure us the rules of the game are not going to be changed for this second review – which should never have been granted in the first place – obviously makes us wonder if we should be worried that the fix is in.”
Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union of BC Indian Chiefs, stated "First Nations were deeply alarmed by the Harper Government's recent announcement to eviscerate the federal Environmental Assessment process as part of their Responsible Resource Development Plan.
If the draft Terms of Reference for the new Panel, which are expected to be finalized any day, drastically reduce or even remove the new Panel’s mandate to consider impacts on Aboriginal rights, it will result in greater uncertainty and intensified conflict on the land."
Chief Baptiste said: “Mr. Harper’s government lived up to its responsibility to the environment and its constitutional duty to protect First Nations rights by rejecting the first bid in 2010 and it surely has no choice but to do so again.
However, it did take the unprecedented step of allowing this second kick at the can for TML, even though the new option was described by the first review panel, TML itself, and Environment Canada as posing even greater environmental risk than the original plan.
“Add to this the fact that the government is pushing through sweeping changes to the EA process in general, to the Fisheries Act, and now we have this letter from TML, and yes, we are concerned,” said Chief Baptiste, “But this letter shows what we are up against.
We will not be silenced and we will not back down. This government endorsed the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and we know that all of Canada is watching what happens here”.
Thx Janice. And ditto.
Comment by MaggieJo Johnson on 4th May 2012
Thanks Janice. And I apolgize for offending you as well. Have a gr8 day and march on.
Comment by Janice Robinson on 4th May 2012
I apologize for offending you with my response to your comment. Have a good day.
Comment by MaggieJo Johnson on 3rd May 2012
I DID say it.
Here I go again...being persecuted for my Faith/Spiritual beliefs when it's a well known fact that First Nations Faith/Spiritual beliefs are never to be "tampered" with...while we all know darn well the "other faiths" are on gag order.
That's what I said in my initial comment...and that's what I question, and that's why I wrote my responding comment to this article.
I'm not hiding behind anything, Janice. I say it like I see it...and like I mean it...the same as you are well-versed in your past comments on this site.
Thank you for your comment.
Again...All for one and One for all? Or is it...
Comment by Janice Robinson on 3rd May 2012
It is a well-known fact that traditional and Christian Tsimshian (and Bahai'a, Buddists, those that follow the Cree way, etc.) say Grace (ask the Creator to bless the food, and the hands that prepared it).
I think you have another issue here. Just say it!
All for one and One for all? Or is it...
Comment by MaggieJo Johnson on 2nd May 2012
Sorry to be a stick in the mud, but if Non-First Nation kids aren't permitted to bring our deeply cultural -based spirituality into the schools....why the favouritism with the First Nations?
I still remember when my son was scolded in DayCare for quietly uttering Grace prior to eating his lunch there. He was firmly instructed never to do that again.