Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
CONTRIBUTION · 4th May 2012
OP ED News - Gustav Wynn
OWS May Day march “downsized” by corporate news

Media Malfeasance: Corporate News Downsizes OWS, Downplays Murdoch Ruling

Tuesday's May Day march was Occupy Wall Street's largest ever, with one NY Times estimate topping out at 30,000 demonstrators.

The exact crowd size was hard to gauge from the street, with events ongoing from morning till night in dozens of locations, people constantly coming and going and police controlling crowd density and flow to prevent traffic shutdowns or overcrowding.

As pictured, from Broadway and Canal, the streets were packed in both directions as far as the eye could see by about 6:30 pm.

Tellingly, the rest of corporate media didn't see it this way.

Reuters: "dud"
AP, WaPo, NY Daily News: "hundreds"
NY Post: "a joke"
CNN: "fizzled"
Businessweek: “weak”

Terrace Daily Reported the same slanted Mayday News coverage Here. CTV: “They just don’t get it.”

When an event overwhelms the venue it was planned for, it's a success. But certain media wants you to think there's "nothing to see here". NYPD aerial photos are routinely withheld, even though they use crowd size estimation experts to plan responses.

CBS video feeds showed only "the tip of the iceberg" in some crowd shots. Even the NY Times website deemed the story unworthy of the front page.

The opinion writers have every right to denounce the movement, its tactics or aims, but the "news" division has a responsibility to present the most basic facts and they did not.

In corporate media, the chain of command is clear. There are many reporters, editors, researchers and photographers, but the bosses end up telling the story from the top down, and employees are commonly gagged by non-disclosure agreements from revealing the story behind the fairy tales that go to press.

This, of course came the same day Rupert Murdoch, the head cheese of the NY Post, WSJ and Fox News was declared "not fit" to manage the News Corp media empire after a year-long inquiry by Parliament. The news barely made a ripple in the US media matrix.


This brings us right back to the main contention behind OWS. Every day, in many ways, wealth is used to gain unfair advantages in debating social or political issues, preventing the public from making informed decisions.

Murdoch is chief among today's biggest propagandists, as Fox remains the biggest player in "news" in the US. But Murdoch and his son James led News Corp as a massive phone hacking and bribery operation gave way to indefensible cover ups and influence peddling at the highest levels.

Within a day of the ruling by the Parliamentary panel, CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) dispatched a letter to the FCC chairman reminding him of clear-cut violations of 'character' expectations for licensees entrusted with serving the public interest.

The lack of serious coverage by corporate news of News Corp's scandal exemplifies media-as-usual, continuing to distort, deny or scrub the most basic facts affecting everyday people.

Originally posted at NYaltnews.com

Updated: Alison Kilkenny at The Nation notes that Reuters corrected their "dud" by reporting the rally was "far from being a dud". Kilkenny reminds the media at large that "a journalist is simply supposed to report what actually happens ".

Gustav Wynn is an inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and more.
Mad Dog Murdoch
Comment by the other terry on 6th May 2012
The media covering up media cover-ups, does it get any worse than this !
People gotta get informed, get out and get involved !
different laws for msm mogols
Comment by Terry on 4th May 2012
Conrad Black is let back into Canada same day he's out of prison . He's a UK subject and a convicted felon . I guess he know where some skeletons are buried . this federal government doesn't even have respect for their own laws or ours . They must just laugh at Canadians from coast to coast to coast .